One For The Troops

First of all let me clear something up; when I said the other day that you should be "be nice would ya". As I have said so many times, to follow Jesus Christ and to serve God you don't always have to be nice to people but you should be pleasant. Anyway let's get on with today's blog ok

I hear a lot of News commentary and other means of communication about how average people feel about this war but rarely do I see or hear what the troops have to say unless it's the wrong point of view or it's the same old left wing story of sadness and gloom.What about all of the good that they are doing over there like putting up new schools and new power plants and giving out cloths to their poor just like we do here in our own country? No, that stuff doesn't seem to get on the news because the fact is, is that the media is painting a picture that our military are the bad guys and the insurgencies are the victims. That couldn't have been done better if the Sundance Channel had been the producers themselves.

What we need is to use the 'Real Network' to actually show what reality is all about when it comes to what a radical Muslim is all about; Cutting off the head of Daniel Pearl is a great example. When's the last time you saw anyone put on any real torture that those people really do instead of them blaming us for things like roughing up some guards and humiliating them sexually like we did at Abu Grab. Think about it, that's all we did, sexually harass a few of their guys and they cut heads off; AND WE'RE THE BAD GUYS?

People like Nancy-girl Pelosi and Teddy Kennedy need to pull their head out of their respective butts and reread that to themselves. We embarrass them and they cut heads off. That is when I call a normal human of reasonable intelligence completely retarded. They just don't seem to get it. And by the way when these people shoot off their mouth about a pole taken about how 68% of Americans feel about how President Bush is doing his job or not on the war on terror; HEY! That's 68% of the people that they picked to talk to, get it, THEY PICKED THE PEOPLE! The pole is rigged. I could go to Detroit and ask the same question and get a worse rating where as I could go and ask the pole in parts of the Bible belt and get a completely different number. Remember, America voted for Taylor Hicks, now rewatch American Idle One and watch Kelly Clarkston and then you tell me that Mr. Hicks isn't a joke. I just watched it last night and I was amazed with the difference in talent.

Another thing they don’t get is the fact that world history has a track record of repeating itself. It’s done it for thousands of years. Back before World War II Germany was bent on taking over the world, and the total slaughter of every Jew, just like Iran is today. Then Japan jumped in and bombed Pearl Harbor and killed several thousand people just like a few Syrians, a couple of Jordanians training in Iraq working along for Hezbollah and Al Qaeda did by crashing airliners into three of our US buildings on 9/11 and another in a field that was headed for the Capital or the Whitehouse.

Just like the Arms Race then, we can not let the bad guys get the biggest badass weapon of all time again because this time these crazy fucks will use it. They don't have the same sense of fair play that the Russians had back in the 1950's. They don't see the world in geopolitical terms. They see it in georeligious terms; if there ever was such a word but the definition being that they want the destruction of every other religion and only those of Muslim faith shall populate the earth when they are done. The Geneva Convention is a joke to them unlike honorable people like the Japanese and we hope the Chinese. They see only the total destruction of America and all that it stands for regardless of what hype they spin on TV and anyone that buys their bullshit is a fool. It's like trusting the Nazis with your Jewish children.

Any of the service men or women that I have spoken to that have come home has told me that first of all they didn't want to leave their buddies there. They also knew exactly why they were there and it was not for the reasons that most of the News keeps talking about. They tell me that it's the politicians that are lying, that I can believe. Now that there is a larger presence over there they defiantly don't want to leave because they know we can win and they don't want politicians slanted to the left to starve them out or do something equally as stupid as that. By the way when we're sort of on the subject but not really, it was President Bush's ADVISERS who told him that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. He did not personally go over there and start flipping rocks. Does anyone think that he did that? Is America and the people that they hired to run this country that stupid? As I recall it was that dude that is now pissed at President Bush because someone else, again, someone else, supposedly leaked his wife's low-level name to the press and now he wants revenge; REVENGE, what a dick!

Listen, Shouldn't President Bush get the benefit of the doubt? As the President's actions was being debated at the United Nations, it was also being debated on shows like Fox news and CNN, both of which I watched allot at the time. On several occasions, I thought for myself the following questions: Should we believe the President of the United States? My answer was that we should give the President the benefit of the doubt, for several reasons deriving from the usual procedures that have operated in every modern White House and that, I assumed, had to be operating in the Bush White House, too.

First, I assume that these statements had all been carefully considered and crafted. Presidential statements are the result of a process, not a moment's thought. White House speechwriters process raw information, and their statements are passed on to senior aides who have both substantive knowledge and political insights. And this all occurs before the statement ever reaches the President for his own review and possible revision.

Second, at least as I and a professor Dean, whom I am getting some of this information off of his website; at least in every White House and administration with which I was familiar, from Truman to Clinton, statements with national security implications were the most carefully considered of all. The White House is aware that, in making these statements, the President is speaking not only to the nation, but also to the world.

Third, these statements are typically corrected rapidly if they are later found to be false. And in this case, far from backpedaling from the President's more extreme claims, the President's press secretary, Ari Fleischer had actually, at times, been even more emphatic than the President had. For example, on January 9, 2003, Fleischer stated, during his press briefing, "We know for a fact that there are weapons there."

In addition, others in the Administration were similarly quick to back the President up, in some cases with even more unequivocal statements. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld repeatedly claimed that Saddam had WMDs, and even went so far as to claim he knew "where they are; they're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad."

Finally, as I understand it, the political risk was so great that, it was inconceivable that the President would make these statements if he didn't have complete solid intelligence to back him up. Presidents do not stick their necks out only to have them chopped off by political opponents on an issue as important as this, and if there was any doubt, I think, the Presidential political advisers would be have telling him to hedge. Rather than stating a matter as fact, he would have been saying: "I have been advised," or "Our intelligence reports strongly suggest," or some such similar shit. But he didn't. Maybe that is where he went wrong but to me the fast still remains that it was his advisers that told him that the stuff was over there.

So what are we now to conclude if the President's statements are found to be as inaccurate as they currently appear to have been? After all, no weapons of mass destruction have been found, and given the President's statements, they should not have been very hard to find - for they existed in large quantities, "thousands of tons" of chemical weapons alone. Moreover, according to the statements, telltale facilities, groups of scientists who could testify, and production equipment also existed.

I have two answers for the weapons of mass destruction; on the matter of the chemical weapons. Sure, it's a fact that throughout Operation Freedom's penetration of Iraq and drive toward Baghdad, the search for WMDs continued. None were found. And as the coalition forces gained control of Iraqi cities and countryside, special search teams were dispatched to look for WMDs. None were found.

Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security John Bolton, while offering no new evidence, assured Congress that WMDs will indeed be found. And he advised that a new unit called the Iraq Survey Group, composed of some 1400 experts and technicians from around the world, is being deployed to assist in the searching.

But, as Time magazine reported, the leads are running out. According to Time, the Marine general in charge explained that "we've been to virtually every ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad," and remarked flatly, "They're simply not there."

Well the answer is clear; they were taken over the boarders of Syria and Iran. There is so much evidence to support this that it is overwhelming America has entered a new age of pre-emption; when it must strike first because it cannot afford to find out later if terrorists possess nuclear or biological weapons, exact intelligence is critical. How will the United States take out a mad despot or a nuclear bomb hidden in a cave if the CIA can't say for sure where they are? And how will Bush be able to maintain support at home and abroad?"

In an apparent attempt to bolster the President's credibility, and his own, Secretary Rumsfeld himself had now called for a Defense Department investigation into what had went wrong with the pre-war intelligence. New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd found this effort about on par with O. J.'s looking for his wife's killer. But there may be a difference: Unless the members of the Administration can find someone else to blame; informants, surveillance technology, lower-level personnel, you name it, they may not escape fault themselves.

To put it more clearly, if the President had taken Congress and the Nation into war based upon bogus information, he would have been cooked. Manipulation or deliberate misuse of national security intelligence data, if proven, could be "a high crime" under the Constitution's impeachment clause. It would also be a violation of federal criminal law, including the broad federal anti-conspiracy statute, which renders it a felony "to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose." But he didn't as I said, he looked to his advisers to tell his what to do and he acted upon that information. These bone heads at the New York Times just want to put a nail in his coffin whenever they can and that is such bullshit.

And one more point I want to make on this cold and snowy day in the Midwest. If you check out the big name Hollywood Networks right now like Turner Classic Movies and the one’s that play the old time stuff, you find that they are all playing in waves a lot of the old war movies but not just the shoot’em up ones and on the Western Channel they’re also playing a certain brand of old time classic movies too. It’s the patriotic classics, the ones that make you proud to be an American and proud to hear the Star Spangle Banner, not to mention the National Anthem. The reasons are probably because they know something is going to happen, soon, and they want us to know so we can be prepared without spouting off the same old dribble as their elitist counterparts within the acting community who don’t know their ass from a hole in the ground because whether we want to admit it or not, many of the top brass in Hollywood and New York is and always shall be of Jewish faith and may God bless them for that.

Ah hell I just get bent out of shape when it comes to the men and women that serve our country and some of the shabby treatment that they get from both sides of the isle right now but at the same time my love of the Lord and my wife both do a great job at to keeping me grounded.

That's The Lazlo Report for February 18, 2007

Telling it like it is

In today’s world of politics there’s a sort of “do it to them before they do to you” attitude. Now, I’m forty-seven and I remember when a candidate would come on to television and say what HE was going to do for the Country and not what his opponent hasn’t done or what the opponent is going to do to screw things up.

During one of the last elections some time ago, my wife asked me while sipping coffee in bed, “When did they all go negative ads”. My answer was that it was just at about the same time that Bill Clinton hired his bald headed, small-minded crony named James Carvelle. Carvelle, a man who could put a spin on his mother murdering a Girl Scout, because the girl didn’t have enough dipsy-doodles, and those on the right in this country would soon forget about the poor little girl whom she murdered because we would all have to sit and listen to Mr. Carvelle talk about his aged mother who’s only joy in life was loving those cookies. And to beet all, I’m sure that Mr. Carvelle would represent his aged mother and get her off scot-free too.

That’s how far to the left this Country has gone and Bill Clinton used to have this man in his ear, every day, all day. If anyone remembers, this man started the hatred of the Republicans from the Democrats but then he had to let it spew onto mainstream television and America seem to approve of it only because he was married to a Republican, Mary Matalin, who just happen to be a friend of the Bush Administration. Although Mr. Carville has a stunning academic record for which I commend him, it still does not excuse the fact that he, along with a select few, guided Bill Clinton to become the first “Black President” something that our country wasn’t ready for until we find an African American person who can put their African heritage aside.

In so that you don’t start thinking that I am not a racist, I will say that again; we are not ready for an African American president until we can find a person who can put their African heritage aside them and stand alone as an American, as just a Black American. There are millions of wonderful black Americans born each day and that live right here in America that don’t prescribe to the diatribe of this African-Islamic anti-Americanism. Notice that I did not say put their African heritage behind them, rather I said I said aside them. That is very important. VERY! I am a white person but I would not ever run on the all white ticket. I also have part American Indian in me but I wouldn’t run on that ticket either, would I.? Think about it, we are all Americans when you get right down to it, well some of us.

The only format that the democrats ran on in 2004 and 2006 was an:”Anything But Bush” campaign, and that actually seemed to work. But what has happened to our135, 000+ troops over in Iraq right now? What about their vote? And how does it make them feel when they’re told that half of America that they’re fighting for has just hired a bunch of people in Congress who think that they are baby killers and murders when they were sent to do a job, a VERY HARD JOB? . And these soldiers want to win this war, not to come home in shame like people such as John Kerry and Nancy Paloci want them to so he, she and others can call this war the Vietnam of the 21st century and that it’s only Bush’s fault. That sort of stupidity is what will get our soldiers killed in action and embolden the enemy. As I said, the enemy does sit over there and watch Comedy Central and they watch Fox News so they see the news reports and they see the stupid comments made about our Commander in Chief.

Do people like Nancy Polosi and the makers of Comedy Central not think that our enemies watch television or are they maybe on the same side? It sometimes makes me wonder whether there’s not a satellite dish on top of the Capital Building and whether it’s pointed toward Algazier's satalite. Radical Muslims in this country are our enemy whether you want to hear that or not. Just read parts of their version of the Koran. In it there are special passages that say that Americans are infidels and all infidels if not converted to Islam must be killed; that’s all men, women and children of the U.S.A. and numbnuts like John Kerry, if he's not in on it because so rich and will never become one of their slaves, is just sitting back and letting this all happen. Oh, shit, just I just let the cat out of the bag???????

And what are people making fun of anyway; because President Bush is a poor public speaker? Allot of people a have problem speaking spontaneously and sometimes it's called stuttering, not lying. He seems to think faster than he speaks, in other words it could be a sign of a very high IQ. Many geniuses are the same way so get over it. At least let’s ridicule him for his supposed lies and not his God given weakness. If anything I'd say the John Kerry’ AND THE Nancy Peloci’ of Washington have been harmed by all of this name calling far more than Mr. Bush because they now have so much corruption in their own party to explain it makes them look stupid for bringing those sort of lies up. But let’s not bring up the fact that none of the ads authorized by the President anything to do with Bill Clinton lying to Congress and lying his wife or anything like that, because as I said in the start of this blog, James Carvelle went into personal attacks; Sort of “he started it”, Mr, Bush just didn’t sink to his level. But it’s all still negative ads and it’s a sad commentary that we’ve stooped to, so low in this country as not to say what you can do, but what the other guy or gal didn’t do . . . . just sad,

Besides, most ads that ran were tied to specific U.S. House, U.S. Senate, or gubernatorial races throughout the country; negative ads and all... Mr. Bush was called everything from a liar to liken to a Nazi. Now that borders on treason in my book. And that was just so that the Democrats could win enough seats in the house and Senate to take over, good Lord! Some of the ads that were not seen as much were of more general issue or advocacy ads and not tied to a particular race or candidate. Those ads were less grievous by far. What I say to all of you is that you better be careful for what you wish for, you might just get it. In other words, be careful for who you vote for, he or she just might win.

Never talked about much is that President Bush is a visionary. Equally so, President Kennedy was a visionary too, as was many of our U.S. Presidents throughout history were. President Bush wants to see a free and democratic Iraq, something that I truly believe that this world needs. Something that only a part of our Government is working toward right now but our Armed Forces is over there and doing it’s best to accomplish. Now, John F Kennedy wanted to push though a bill to adopt the metric system. I remember this when I was in grade school. Why, because he was a communist? I think not. Because he was a visionary and how easy it would be for all of us right now to watch The Science Channel, The Learning Channel and The Discovery Channel and to try and figure out how long things are in meters. Some Presidents are visionaries; they can see the future in realistic terms, it just takes an open mind to let their dreams for our great nation come true. These men write history, we live it, we write it down, and then we judge them on it.

I think that because the mainstream media is so far to the left and the Media is owned by the Left that President Bush will be remembered for nothing more than the terrible jokes, the lies that were told about him and a war that had to be fought for our freedom. No mention of all of the great things that he did while in office. Such happened to many of our great Presidents because of the Media. After Johnson took over for Kennedy, he wrote and passed more bills though congress on civil rights than all of the Bills that JFK passed while in office yet why is John Kennedy so famous and President Johnson not? It’s because the leftist media and them spinning the real truth while what John Kennedy really did was to spend most of his time dealing with personal problems like Marilyn Monroe and his beautiful wife and children and then he had just one big media blow up, the Cuban missile crisis. The Vietnam War along with the Cuban Missile Crisis in Kennedy’s time was ran by someone else, Bob McNamara, so don’t get the two confused. Hmmm, it seems that Bill Clinton and his mentor, JFK, had more in common than people know, someone in his ear telling him what he should do so he could go off and get his dick sucked….Hhmmmmm

I hope that Bill Clinton will be remembered for lying to Congress, lying to his wife about having several affairs, having an intern give him a botched blowjob in the oval office and then her keeping the dress I hope that he’s remembered for his wife’s financial scandal and the possible ties to the murder of Vince Foster which is of equally important. I hope that on a grave marker somewhere that it says “here lies Bill Clinton he hired James Carvelle the architect of negative ads”. But alas, I doubt it, because I also think that Bill Clinton has such a large penis that it doesn’t matter what lies about he tells or who he tries to poke because he’s made his deal with the devil and at this point there ain’t no go’n back. He will however have to pay the piper one day. That day is coming soon., for all of us Appropriately I will end this Blog with another old saying that I do hope it comes back, and soon, Count Your Blessings Folks, you’re going to need to..

That’s the Lazlo Report for January 16, 2007

Giving Whoopi Airtime

This one is Short and sweet, hopefully to the point. Several nights ago on Hanity & Colmbs, of Fox News, they had as their guest, Whoopi Goldberg. (born Caryn Elaine Johnson for those who give a crap)

Now even if Mr. Hanity was to tear Whoopi a new one on his show that night, which I'm sure he did, I mean I don’t know I didn’t waste my time staying up to listen to her liberal crap that night, I just don't understand why she or her “pootie” is asked to be a guest on anyone's show for her to spew out her liberal agenda to the world when she is a COMEDIAN, not a politician, not a spokesperson, not a Ambassador to any counrty,nothing. If she’s not telling jokes she’s just an average Jane who gets airtime because she’s rich.

Now Sean Hanity is truly a great American because he works every day doing his best to better the county that has given him the things that he has, the opportunity to use his talent in his crusade to make a better United States and is not keeping all of his “winnings” or by that I mean he is giving back to the society that has been so good to him.

What I see Whoppi Goldberg do, the very rich Whoppi Goldberg do, is to complain about local government, complain about federal government, complain that no one gets taken care of by that government, that she isn’t taken care of by the government and that George Bush is the spawn of the Devil himself.

Dear Miss Whoppi: I have a suggestion for you; get off your fat ass, stop complaining and do a free concert that is not political at all, just funny shit (if even remember how) then donate all of that money, every red cent, to any poor people that you want. Now, THAT’S doing something. NOT going on Hanity & Colms plus numerous other television and radio shows and complaining about that evil George Bus. All I hear is that you can bitch pretty good but here are some facts that may surprise you:

World War II cost the United States an amount equal to approximately a full year's GDP -- adjusted for inflation, equal to about $12 trillion dollars back in 1945.

WWII cost America more than 400,000 killed in action, and nearly 100,000 still missing in action.

The Iraq war has, so far, cost the US about $160 billion dollars, which is roughly what 9/11 cost New York. It has also cost about 2,200 American lives, which is roughly 2/3 of the 3,000 lives that the Jihad snuffed out on 9/11. But the cost of not fighting and winning WWII would have been unimaginably greater, it’s inconceivable what this country would be like because there would be no “African American” people under the American Nazi Government.

And if the terrorist win the War on Terror that your adversary, George W. Bush, is so strongly fighting against, then there will again be slaves to another régime, this time it will be called the Islamic Régime and they don’t like black people either. Think about it Miss Whoopie.

That’s the Lazlo Report for Thursday January 4rd, 2007